Ideology and international law are interrelated phenomenon. They both belong to normative phenomena. Politics and law are the most important means of implementation of the ideological concepts. In turn, policy and law need to ensure that the ideology of a social support, as well as the theoretical interpretation of the challenges ahead. Ideology affects international law as a policy, as well as directly. It includes political, legal, moral, philosophical ideas, principles, installation. The structure consists of ideology and international legal consciousness, which plays an important role in the functioning of international law. For example, during the cold war among some of the Western international lawyers existed stable point of view that because of fundamental differences in ideology, the agreement between the socialist and capitalist states are impossible. Suffice it to recall a very significant ideological tenet of U.S. President Ronald Reagan regarding the fact that the Soviet Union – is the “evil empire. “Reciprocity”, however, paid and government lawyers. Extreme view, perhaps, is the adoption of Adolf Hitler: “… contracts may be concluded only between the parties, standing on the same ideological platform.”

In turn, WFP has an impact on the ideology of its objectives, principles, norms, and practices for their implementation. WFP also regulates the content of ideological work in the international arena. Prohibited propaganda, able to create or strengthen a threat to or breach of peace. Outlawed the Nazi ideology, racism, etc. Now we hear words about “removing ideology” of international relations and law. Under this should be understood as the removal of international disputes about the superiority of a particular social system, as well as methods of ideological warfare. With regard to the struggle of ideas, it remains a factor for further development of world development.

Continuous interaction also exists between the international universal morality and international law. Often, moral norms are transformed into norms of WFP, or, more precisely, the WFP arise rules in line with universal morality. For example, the crime  CFV peace and humanity for a long time condemning only moral norms. However, after the First World War, they gradually turned into the principles of WFP, to finalize the post-Second World War. “In essence, the entire UN Charter, the most important document of international law, based on some simple laws of morality and justice … Do not underestimate the fact that the spirit of modern international law is the age-old aspirations of the peoples’ .1 It is indicative of the fact that the fundamental principle of international law – the principle of good faith compliance – is both a key principle of international morality, international “gentleman’s code of conduct” of the state.

Currently, the role of international law increases as the world community is in progress after the elimination of post-war transformation of the bipolar model of international development. On the one hand, intensified the processes of regionalization of international relations, on the other hand, the developing world information environment that is increasingly united world community, with a third party, picking up new contradictions in the relations between major powers, which give rise to new forms of cooperation and the redistribution of political influence ; on the fourth side, gradually diminished the role of international mechanisms for the maintenance, which generally worked successfully during the Cold War “(UN, CSCE, etc.) and so on. In these circumstances, international law can make a tool to maintain order in the world community, to ensure continuity between the positive achievements in international cooperation XX century and the coming model of international relations Century XXI. That is why the UN General Assembly on the 60-m films  Narn meeting, 17 November 1989 adopted resolution 44/23 on the proclamation of the 90′s. XX century. Decade of International Law.